But based on u/GoldenTaipei's post below, it sounds like I don't have too much to worry about. Since I can review this online for free, I'd be a tad disappointed if CT-ART were the same way, and very disappointed, if three out of its five courses were that way. And in my experience with chess training software, it's assumed that you're shaky on this stuff in Chess Mentor, for example, the first 400-ish (of 2000-ish) exercises are basic in this sense. Which is why I want to buy CT-ART.īut when I say I can learn "the basics" for free online, I mean basic basics, like one-move mates or forks or double attacks, or even stuff like "this is how you read coordinates" or "this is how you estimate the value of material"-stuff so simple that it could be automatically curated with negligible loss of instructional value. No curation required, at least not by a sentient human. Professionally curated problems, as in CT-ART, are definitely much more instructive than anything that's free online my understanding is that sites like or lichess just pull random middlegame positions and then set Stockfish's best move as the right answer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |